5smm.com vs allmediapromotion.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 14, 2026.
| 2 panels |
59/ 100 · Solid
|
59/ 100 · Solid
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 3,577 | 275 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.0007 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 3,807,419 orders | 968,424 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | no growth read | about 21 a day (+644 over 30 days) |
| User rating | 4.2 of 5 · 111 reviews | 3.5 of 5 · 1 reviews |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot, RatingFacts | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: allmediapromotion.com 7 · 5smm.com 5
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram likes | $0.09 | $0.092 |
| Instagram views | $0.012 | $0.001 |
| Instagram comments | $2.45 | $0.729 |
| Instagram shares | $0.15 | $0.0095 |
| TikTok followers | $1.74 | $2.02 |
| TikTok likes | $0.16 | $0.594 |
| TikTok views | $0.07 | $0.0087 |
| YouTube likes | $1.04 | $0.24 |
| YouTube views | $0.36 | $0.17 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.09 | $25.67 |
| Telegram likes | $0.02 | $0.03 |
| Telegram views | $0.02 | $0.0049 |
| Telegram members | $0.32 | $0.278 |
| Telegram comments | $1.93 | $2.74 |
| Facebook followers | $0.19 | $0.142 |
| Facebook likes | $0.13 | $0.135 |
| Facebook views | $0.04 | $0.018 |
| Facebook members | $0.65 | $0.228 |
| Facebook shares | $1.28 | $0.468 |
| Twitter / X followers | $3.25 | $0.863 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.01 | $0.0007 |
| Twitter / X shares | $1.31 | $0.56 |
| Spotify followers | $0.15 | $0.297 |
| Spotify views | $0.23 | $0.094 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
5smm.com against…
5smm.com vs allmediapromotion.com: questions and answers
Answers about 5smm.com vs allmediapromotion.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 14, 2026.
5smm.com and allmediapromotion.com both score 59 of 100 on the Trust Score. allmediapromotion.com is the older of the two, online since 2018; 5smm.com since 2022. 5smm.com lists 3,577 services from $0.01 per 1,000, allmediapromotion.com 275 from $0.0007. On the 8 services both sell, allmediapromotion.com is cheaper on 5. 5smm.com's public counter stands at 3.8M orders, allmediapromotion.com's at 968K (about 21 a day (+644 over 30 days)). Users rate 5smm.com 4.2 of 5 across 111 reviews, allmediapromotion.com 3.5 across 1. The measures split evenly between the two — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram likes: $0.09 on 5smm.com against $0.092 on allmediapromotion.com; Instagram views: $0.012 on 5smm.com against $0.001 on allmediapromotion.com; Instagram comments: $2.45 on 5smm.com against $0.729 on allmediapromotion.com; Instagram shares: $0.15 on 5smm.com against $0.0095 on allmediapromotion.com. allmediapromotion.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
5smm.com since 2022, 3.8M orders on its counter; allmediapromotion.com since 2018, 968K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
5smm.com: unclaimed, rated 4.2 across 111 reviews, Trust Score 59. allmediapromotion.com: unclaimed, rated 3.5 across 1 reviews, Trust Score 59. The evidence is even, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.