5smm.com vs snmspeedpanel.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 2, 2026.
| 2 panels |
52/ 100 · Fair
|
59/ 100 · Solid
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 3,652 | 534 |
| Lowest price | $0.007 per 1,000 | $0.004 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 7,378,668 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 4,476 a day (+134,277 over 30 days) |
| User rating | 4.2 of 5 · 111 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot, RatingFacts | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: snmspeedpanel.com 8 · 5smm.com 4
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.42 | $0.73 |
| Instagram likes | $0.09 | $0.06 |
| Instagram views | $0.012 | $0.01 |
| Instagram comments | $2.49 | $4.25 |
| TikTok followers | $1.57 | $0.96 |
| TikTok likes | $0.16 | $0.02 |
| TikTok views | $0.11 | $0.004 |
| TikTok comments | $1.16 | $1.43 |
| YouTube likes | $1.04 | $0.75 |
| YouTube views | $0.46 | $0.24 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.09 | $0.84 |
| YouTube comments | $2.90 | $2.22 |
| Telegram likes | $0.02 | $0.06 |
| Telegram views | $0.02 | $0.004 |
| Telegram members | $0.32 | $0.034 |
| Telegram comments | $1.93 | $1.30 |
| Facebook followers | $0.17 | $0.13 |
| Facebook likes | $0.12 | $0.23 |
| Facebook views | $0.04 | $0.03 |
| Facebook members | $0.54 | $0.36 |
| Facebook comments | $2.31 | $2.19 |
| Twitter / X followers | $3.33 | $0.90 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.85 | $1.60 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.007 | $0.01 |
| Twitter / X comments | $36.25 | $31.20 |
| Twitter / X shares | $1.31 | $3.30 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
5smm.com vs snmspeedpanel.com: questions and answers
Answers about 5smm.com vs snmspeedpanel.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 2, 2026.
snmspeedpanel.com scores 59 of 100 on the Trust Score, 5smm.com 52 — a 7-point gap. Both have been online since 2022. 5smm.com lists 3,652 services from $0.007 per 1,000, snmspeedpanel.com 534 from $0.004. On the 8 services both sell, snmspeedpanel.com is cheaper on 5. snmspeedpanel.com shows a public counter — 7.4M orders, about 4,476 a day (+134,277 over 30 days) — while 5smm.com shows none. 5smm.com is rated 4.2 of 5 across 111 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of snmspeedpanel.com there. Of the 6 measures compared, snmspeedpanel.com leads 4 and 5smm.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.42 on 5smm.com against $0.73 on snmspeedpanel.com; Instagram likes: $0.09 on 5smm.com against $0.06 on snmspeedpanel.com; Instagram views: $0.012 on 5smm.com against $0.01 on snmspeedpanel.com; Instagram comments: $2.49 on 5smm.com against $4.25 on snmspeedpanel.com. snmspeedpanel.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
5smm.com since 2022, no public counter; snmspeedpanel.com since 2022, 7.4M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
5smm.com: unclaimed, rated 4.2 across 111 reviews, Trust Score 52. snmspeedpanel.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 59. snmspeedpanel.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.