andrew-panel.mpnl.pro vs growtak.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 31, 2026.
| 2 panels |
30/ 100 · Guarded
|
30/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 4,695 | 1,097 |
| Lowest price | $0.0002 per 1,000 | $0.0006 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 75,299 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | no growth read | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: growtak.com 7 · andrew-panel.mpnl.pro 5
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.067 | $0.911 |
| Instagram likes | $0.017 | $0.086 |
| Instagram views | $0.017 | $0.0006 |
| Instagram comments | $0.541 | $0.47 |
| Instagram shares | $0.493 | $0.0007 |
| TikTok followers | $1.22 | $1.14 |
| TikTok likes | $0.112 | $0.065 |
| TikTok views | $0.0008 | $0.0077 |
| TikTok comments | $0.277 | $1.66 |
| YouTube likes | $0.291 | $0.163 |
| YouTube views | $0.492 | $0.549 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.319 | $0.072 |
| YouTube comments | $0.557 | $4.32 |
| Telegram likes | $0.069 | $0.011 |
| Telegram views | $0.0092 | $0.0014 |
| Telegram members | $0.401 | $0.101 |
| Facebook followers | $0.668 | $0.137 |
| Facebook likes | $0.416 | $0.118 |
| Facebook views | $0.051 | $0.022 |
| Facebook members | $0.959 | $0.681 |
| Facebook comments | $13.87 | $1.45 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.832 | $0.725 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.213 | $0.687 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0002 | $0.0024 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.347 | $1.17 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
andrew-panel.mpnl.pro against…
andrew-panel.mpnl.pro vs growtak.com: questions and answers
Answers about andrew-panel.mpnl.pro vs growtak.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 31, 2026.
andrew-panel.mpnl.pro and growtak.com both score 30 of 100 on the Trust Score. andrew-panel.mpnl.pro is the older of the two, online since 2024; growtak.com since 2025. andrew-panel.mpnl.pro lists 4,695 services from $0.0002 per 1,000, growtak.com 1,097 from $0.0006. On the 8 services both sell, growtak.com is cheaper on 5. andrew-panel.mpnl.pro shows a public counter — 75K orders — while growtak.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 4 measures compared, andrew-panel.mpnl.pro leads 3 and growtak.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.067 on andrew-panel.mpnl.pro against $0.911 on growtak.com; Instagram likes: $0.017 on andrew-panel.mpnl.pro against $0.086 on growtak.com; Instagram views: $0.017 on andrew-panel.mpnl.pro against $0.0006 on growtak.com; Instagram comments: $0.541 on andrew-panel.mpnl.pro against $0.47 on growtak.com. growtak.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
andrew-panel.mpnl.pro since 2024, 75K orders on its counter; growtak.com since 2025, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
andrew-panel.mpnl.pro: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 30. growtak.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 30. andrew-panel.mpnl.pro has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.