barqlikes.com vs junglesmm.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 24, 2026.
| 2 panels |
35/ 100 · Guarded
|
35/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 5,406 | 4,371 |
| Lowest price | $0.0027 per 1,000 | $0.0018 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 744,433 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 961 a day (+28,818 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: barqlikes.com 6 · junglesmm.com 6
| Service |  barqlikes.com |  junglesmm.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.615 | $1.70 |
| Instagram likes | $0.022 | $0.07 |
| Instagram views | $0.0027 | $0.0018 |
| Instagram members | $1.13 | $2.64 |
| Instagram comments | $0.319 | $1.14 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0027 | $0.0024 |
| TikTok followers | $2.38 | $2.25 |
| TikTok likes | $0.093 | $0.189 |
| TikTok views | $0.022 | $0.019 |
| TikTok comments | $1.33 | $1.30 |
| TikTok shares | $0.054 | $0.0095 |
| YouTube likes | $0.248 | $0.28 |
| YouTube views | $0.411 | $0.846 |
| YouTube comments | $3.69 | $5.99 |
| Telegram likes | $0.016 | $0.08 |
| Telegram views | $0.0027 | $0.005 |
| Telegram members | $0.37 | $0.041 |
| Facebook followers | $0.207 | $0.352 |
| Facebook likes | $0.152 | $0.148 |
| Facebook members | $0.479 | $0.572 |
| Facebook comments | $2.24 | $2.59 |
| Facebook shares | $0.169 | $0.22 |
| Spotify followers | $0.656 | $0.22 |
| Spotify views | $0.234 | $0.22 |
| LinkedIn likes | $15.28 | $6.83 |
| WhatsApp likes | $0.411 | $3.01 |
| WhatsApp members | $0.411 | $0.50 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
barqlikes.com vs junglesmm.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about barqlikes.com vs junglesmm.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 24, 2026.
barqlikes.com and junglesmm.com both score 35 of 100 on the Trust Score. barqlikes.com is the older of the two, online since 2020; junglesmm.com since 2024. barqlikes.com lists 5,406 services from $0.0027 per 1,000, junglesmm.com 4,371 from $0.0018. On the 8 services both sell, barqlikes.com is cheaper on 5. junglesmm.com shows a public counter — 744K orders, about 961 a day (+28,818 over 30 days) — while barqlikes.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, barqlikes.com leads 3 and junglesmm.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.615 on barqlikes.com against $1.70 on junglesmm.com; Instagram likes: $0.022 on barqlikes.com against $0.07 on junglesmm.com; Instagram views: $0.0027 on barqlikes.com against $0.0018 on junglesmm.com; Instagram members: $1.13 on barqlikes.com against $2.64 on junglesmm.com. barqlikes.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
barqlikes.com since 2020, no public counter; junglesmm.com since 2024, 744K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
barqlikes.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 35. junglesmm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 35. barqlikes.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.