buysocialworld.com vs cheapestsmmpanels.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 1, 2026.
| 2 panels |
48/ 100 · Fair
|
48/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,234 | 2,383 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.0013 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | 2.0 of 5 · 15 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: cheapestsmmpanels.com 8 · buysocialworld.com 4
| Service |  buysocialworld.com |  cheapestsmmpanels.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.06 | $0.601 |
| Instagram likes | $0.01 | $0.132 |
| Instagram views | $0.01 | $0.0013 |
| Instagram comments | $0.59 | $0.658 |
| Instagram shares | $0.08 | $0.0016 |
| TikTok followers | $2.34 | $1.65 |
| TikTok likes | $0.78 | $0.386 |
| TikTok views | $0.02 | $0.0095 |
| TikTok shares | $0.19 | $0.097 |
| YouTube likes | $0.36 | $0.262 |
| YouTube views | $0.06 | $0.20 |
| YouTube shares | $0.24 | $0.213 |
| Telegram views | $0.01 | $0.0017 |
| Telegram members | $0.25 | $0.13 |
| Facebook followers | $0.19 | $0.188 |
| Facebook likes | $0.24 | $0.128 |
| Facebook views | $0.04 | $0.03 |
| Facebook members | $0.26 | $0.35 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.01 | $0.0015 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.01 | $1.33 |
| Spotify views | $26.14 | $0.105 |
| Audiomack views | $3.63 | $0.245 |
| SoundCloud views | $3.74 | $17.70 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
buysocialworld.com against…
buysocialworld.com vs cheapestsmmpanels.com: questions and answers
Answers about buysocialworld.com vs cheapestsmmpanels.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 1, 2026.
buysocialworld.com and cheapestsmmpanels.com both score 48 of 100 on the Trust Score. cheapestsmmpanels.com is the older of the two, online since 2020; buysocialworld.com since 2021. buysocialworld.com lists 1,234 services from $0.01 per 1,000, cheapestsmmpanels.com 2,383 from $0.0013. On the 8 services both sell, cheapestsmmpanels.com is cheaper on 5. cheapestsmmpanels.com is rated 2.0 of 5 across 15 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of buysocialworld.com there. Of the 4 measures compared, cheapestsmmpanels.com leads 4. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.06 on buysocialworld.com against $0.601 on cheapestsmmpanels.com; Instagram likes: $0.01 on buysocialworld.com against $0.132 on cheapestsmmpanels.com; Instagram views: $0.01 on buysocialworld.com against $0.0013 on cheapestsmmpanels.com; Instagram comments: $0.59 on buysocialworld.com against $0.658 on cheapestsmmpanels.com. cheapestsmmpanels.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
buysocialworld.com since 2021, no public counter; cheapestsmmpanels.com since 2020, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
buysocialworld.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 48. cheapestsmmpanels.com: unclaimed, rated 2.0 across 15 reviews, Trust Score 48. cheapestsmmpanels.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.