cheapchipspan.com vs myfame.in
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 26, 2026.
| 2 panels |
44/ 100 · Fair
|
43/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 3,452 | 169 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.0009 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 109,688 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 4 a day (+51 over 13 days) | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | 2.2 of 5 · 55 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot, RatingFacts |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: cheapchipspan.com 7 · myfame.in 5
| Service |  cheapchipspan.com |  myfame.in |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.04 | $3.05 |
| Instagram likes | $0.03 | $0.276 |
| Instagram views | $0.01 | $0.005 |
| Instagram comments | $0.94 | $0.786 |
| Instagram shares | $0.02 | $0.0009 |
| TikTok followers | $0.99 | $5.49 |
| TikTok likes | $0.03 | $1.82 |
| TikTok views | $0.04 | $0.222 |
| TikTok comments | $0.38 | $10.10 |
| YouTube likes | $1.54 | $9.20 |
| YouTube views | $1.30 | $0.88 |
| YouTube comments | $6.93 | $4.94 |
| Telegram likes | $0.05 | $0.024 |
| Telegram views | $0.02 | $0.074 |
| Telegram members | $0.17 | $0.959 |
| Facebook followers | $0.31 | $1.34 |
| Facebook likes | $0.38 | $0.453 |
| Facebook views | $0.07 | $0.106 |
| Facebook comments | $64.84 | $19.00 |
| Twitter / X likes | $5.39 | $1.23 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.01 | $0.016 |
| Snapchat followers | $34.65 | $26.67 |
| WhatsApp members | $10.63 | $5.79 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
cheapchipspan.com against…
cheapchipspan.com vs myfame.in: questions and answers
Straight answers about cheapchipspan.com vs myfame.in, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 26, 2026.
cheapchipspan.com scores 44 of 100 on the Trust Score, myfame.in 43 — a 1-point gap. cheapchipspan.com is the older of the two, online since 2020; myfame.in since 2022. cheapchipspan.com lists 3,452 services from $0.01 per 1,000, myfame.in 169 from $0.0009. On the 8 services both sell, cheapchipspan.com is cheaper on 5. cheapchipspan.com shows a public counter — 110K orders, about 4 a day (+51 over 13 days) — while myfame.in shows none. myfame.in is rated 2.2 of 5 across 55 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of cheapchipspan.com there. Of the 7 measures compared, cheapchipspan.com leads 6 and myfame.in 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.04 on cheapchipspan.com against $3.05 on myfame.in; Instagram likes: $0.03 on cheapchipspan.com against $0.276 on myfame.in; Instagram views: $0.01 on cheapchipspan.com against $0.005 on myfame.in; Instagram comments: $0.94 on cheapchipspan.com against $0.786 on myfame.in. cheapchipspan.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
cheapchipspan.com since 2020, 110K orders on its counter; myfame.in since 2022, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
cheapchipspan.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 44. myfame.in: unclaimed, rated 2.2 across 55 reviews, Trust Score 43. cheapchipspan.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.