clicknovasmm.com vs zfam.in
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 26, 2026.
| 2 panels |
34/ 100 · Guarded
|
35/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2026 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 3,671 | 727 |
| Lowest price | $0.0016 per 1,000 | $0.001 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 9,182 orders | 38,372,912 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 101 a day (+3,018 over 30 days) | no growth read |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: clicknovasmm.com 7 · zfam.in 5
| Service |  clicknovasmm.com |  zfam.in |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.159 | $0.261 |
| Instagram likes | $0.013 | $0.035 |
| Instagram views | $0.0016 | $0.001 |
| Instagram comments | $0.195 | $0.394 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0075 | $0.0094 |
| TikTok followers | $0.808 | $1.23 |
| TikTok likes | $0.019 | $0.019 |
| TikTok views | $0.0087 | $0.001 |
| TikTok comments | $0.868 | $0.353 |
| YouTube likes | $0.382 | $0.145 |
| YouTube views | $0.32 | $0.449 |
| YouTube subscribers | $15.45 | $0.126 |
| YouTube comments | $4.57 | $3.67 |
| Telegram likes | $0.012 | $0.016 |
| Telegram views | $0.0031 | $0.0019 |
| Telegram members | $0.012 | $0.089 |
| Facebook followers | $0.279 | $0.067 |
| Facebook likes | $0.12 | $0.088 |
| Facebook views | $0.022 | $0.019 |
| Facebook members | $0.204 | $0.253 |
| Facebook comments | $0.177 | $0.746 |
| Facebook shares | $0.024 | $0.027 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.279 | $1.17 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.29 | $0.639 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0021 | $0.0082 |
| Twitter / X shares | $2.00 | $0.621 |
| WhatsApp likes | $1.10 | $0.821 |
| WhatsApp members | $2.35 | $1.89 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
clicknovasmm.com vs zfam.in: questions and answers
Answers about clicknovasmm.com vs zfam.in from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 26, 2026.
zfam.in scores 35 of 100 on the Trust Score, clicknovasmm.com 34 — a 1-point gap. zfam.in is the older of the two, online since 2025; clicknovasmm.com since 2026. clicknovasmm.com lists 3,671 services from $0.0016 per 1,000, zfam.in 727 from $0.001. On the 8 services both sell, clicknovasmm.com is cheaper on 6. clicknovasmm.com's public counter stands at 9,182 orders (about 101 a day (+3,018 over 30 days)), zfam.in's at 38M. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. The measures split evenly between the two — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.159 on clicknovasmm.com against $0.261 on zfam.in; Instagram likes: $0.013 on clicknovasmm.com against $0.035 on zfam.in; Instagram views: $0.0016 on clicknovasmm.com against $0.001 on zfam.in; Instagram comments: $0.195 on clicknovasmm.com against $0.394 on zfam.in. clicknovasmm.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
clicknovasmm.com since 2026, 9,182 orders on its counter; zfam.in since 2025, 38M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
clicknovasmm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 34. zfam.in: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 35. zfam.in has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.