fans1688.com vs smmbuzz.net
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 22, 2026.
| 2 panels |
32/ 100 · Guarded
|
32/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 306 | 4,170 |
| Lowest price | $0.0045 per 1,000 | $0.0018 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 3.0 of 5 · 1,688 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmbuzz.net 11 · fans1688.com 1
| Service |  fans1688.com |  smmbuzz.net |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $2.57 | $0.705 |
| Instagram likes | $0.121 | $0.056 |
| Instagram views | $0.0089 | $0.0025 |
| Instagram comments | $7.24 | $0.525 |
| Instagram shares | $0.13 | $0.0018 |
| TikTok followers | $3.07 | $1.95 |
| TikTok likes | $0.057 | $0.239 |
| TikTok views | $0.022 | $0.011 |
| TikTok comments | $13.91 | $4.80 |
| TikTok shares | $0.277 | $0.031 |
| YouTube likes | $4.15 | $0.856 |
| YouTube views | $0.618 | $0.476 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.092 | $5.23 |
| YouTube comments | $6.69 | $0.397 |
| Telegram likes | $0.092 | $0.017 |
| Telegram views | $0.0075 | $0.0025 |
| Telegram members | $0.413 | $0.334 |
| Telegram shares | $0.08 | $0.016 |
| Facebook followers | $0.586 | $0.184 |
| Facebook likes | $0.855 | $0.127 |
| Facebook views | $0.079 | $0.034 |
| Facebook members | $1.26 | $0.324 |
| Facebook comments | $12.49 | $3.32 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.11 | $0.973 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.46 | $0.969 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.006 | $0.0018 |
| Twitter / X comments | $44.72 | $14.24 |
| LinkedIn followers | $50.82 | $8.75 |
| LinkedIn likes | $22.47 | $11.23 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
fans1688.com vs smmbuzz.net: questions and answers
Straight answers about fans1688.com vs smmbuzz.net, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 22, 2026.
fans1688.com and smmbuzz.net both score 32 of 100 on the Trust Score. smmbuzz.net is the older of the two, online since 2021; fans1688.com since 2022. fans1688.com lists 306 services from $0.0045 per 1,000, smmbuzz.net 4,170 from $0.0018. On the 8 services both sell, smmbuzz.net is cheaper on 7. fans1688.com is rated 3.0 of 5 across 1,688 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of smmbuzz.net there. Of the 4 measures compared, smmbuzz.net leads 3 and fans1688.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $2.57 on fans1688.com against $0.705 on smmbuzz.net; Instagram likes: $0.121 on fans1688.com against $0.056 on smmbuzz.net; Instagram views: $0.0089 on fans1688.com against $0.0025 on smmbuzz.net; Instagram comments: $7.24 on fans1688.com against $0.525 on smmbuzz.net. smmbuzz.net is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
fans1688.com since 2022, no public counter; smmbuzz.net since 2021, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
fans1688.com: unclaimed, rated 3.0 across 1,688 reviews, Trust Score 32. smmbuzz.net: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 32. smmbuzz.net has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.