fansforu.com vs igtask.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 25, 2026.
| 2 panels |
48/ 100 · Fair
|
48/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 9,220 | 1,182 |
| Lowest price | $0.0008 per 1,000 | $0.001 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 22,702,821 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 5,913 a day (+177,400 over 30 days) | — |
| User rating | 2.3 of 5 · 8 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: fansforu.com 11 · igtask.com 1
| Service |  fansforu.com |  igtask.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.10 | $0.18 |
| Instagram likes | $0.013 | $0.038 |
| Instagram views | $0.0014 | $0.001 |
| Instagram comments | $0.155 | $6.00 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0011 | $0.09 |
| TikTok followers | $0.205 | $0.85 |
| TikTok likes | $0.012 | $0.026 |
| TikTok views | $0.0028 | $0.0069 |
| TikTok comments | $0.65 | $0.90 |
| YouTube likes | $0.12 | $0.70 |
| YouTube views | $0.25 | $0.32 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.099 | $1.76 |
| YouTube comments | $1.65 | $7.50 |
| Telegram members | $0.011 | $0.55 |
| Facebook followers | $0.10 | $0.225 |
| Facebook likes | $0.073 | $0.26 |
| Facebook members | $0.178 | $1.88 |
| Facebook comments | $3.64 | $6.66 |
| Facebook shares | $0.117 | $1.60 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.30 | $0.81 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.375 | $0.725 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.101 | $0.933 |
| Spotify followers | $0.296 | $0.609 |
| Spotify views | $0.266 | $0.11 |
| Threads followers | $0.613 | $3.30 |
| Threads likes | $0.803 | $2.20 |
| LinkedIn followers | $4.90 | $11.00 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
fansforu.com vs igtask.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about fansforu.com vs igtask.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 25, 2026.
fansforu.com and igtask.com both score 48 of 100 on the Trust Score. Both have been online since 2021. fansforu.com lists 9,220 services from $0.0008 per 1,000, igtask.com 1,182 from $0.001. On the 8 services both sell, fansforu.com is cheaper on 7. fansforu.com shows a public counter — 23M orders, about 5,913 a day (+177,400 over 30 days) — while igtask.com shows none. fansforu.com is rated 2.3 of 5 across 8 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of igtask.com there. Of the 5 measures compared, fansforu.com leads 5. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.10 on fansforu.com against $0.18 on igtask.com; Instagram likes: $0.013 on fansforu.com against $0.038 on igtask.com; Instagram views: $0.0014 on fansforu.com against $0.001 on igtask.com; Instagram comments: $0.155 on fansforu.com against $6.00 on igtask.com. fansforu.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
fansforu.com since 2021, 23M orders on its counter; igtask.com since 2021, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
fansforu.com: unclaimed, rated 2.3 across 8 reviews, Trust Score 48. igtask.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 48. fansforu.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.