fastboostingpoint.com vs lhfollowers.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 26, 2026.
| 2 panels |
56/ 100 · Fair
|
54/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,044 | 161 |
| Lowest price | $0.0024 per 1,000 | $0.09 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 96,899 orders | 60,549 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 71 a day (+2,116 over 30 days) | about 4 a day (+110 over 30 days) |
| User rating | 3.9 of 5 · 5 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Sitejabber, Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: fastboostingpoint.com 11 · lhfollowers.com 1
| Service |  fastboostingpoint.com |  lhfollowers.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.524 | $4.40 |
| Instagram likes | $0.083 | $0.39 |
| Instagram views | $0.0032 | $0.29 |
| Instagram comments | $6.81 | $7.49 |
| Instagram shares | $0.651 | $0.54 |
| TikTok followers | $1.83 | $3.42 |
| TikTok likes | $0.207 | $0.72 |
| TikTok views | $0.011 | $0.09 |
| YouTube likes | $0.253 | $1.80 |
| YouTube views | $0.473 | $1.28 |
| Facebook followers | $0.168 | $1.10 |
| Facebook likes | $0.118 | $0.26 |
| Facebook views | $0.035 | $0.11 |
| Facebook members | $0.408 | $3.74 |
| Facebook comments | $3.45 | $5.59 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.813 | $7.92 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0068 | $0.17 |
| WhatsApp followers | $3.45 | $13.75 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
fastboostingpoint.com against…
fastboostingpoint.com vs lhfollowers.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about fastboostingpoint.com vs lhfollowers.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 26, 2026.
fastboostingpoint.com scores 56 of 100 on the Trust Score, lhfollowers.com 54 — a 2-point gap. Both have been online since 2022. fastboostingpoint.com lists 1,044 services from $0.0024 per 1,000, lhfollowers.com 161 from $0.09. On the 8 services both sell, fastboostingpoint.com is cheaper on 7. fastboostingpoint.com's public counter stands at 97K orders (about 71 a day (+2,116 over 30 days)), lhfollowers.com's at 61K (about 4 a day (+110 over 30 days)). fastboostingpoint.com is rated 3.9 of 5 across 5 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of lhfollowers.com there. Of the 6 measures compared, fastboostingpoint.com leads 6. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.524 on fastboostingpoint.com against $4.40 on lhfollowers.com; Instagram likes: $0.083 on fastboostingpoint.com against $0.39 on lhfollowers.com; Instagram views: $0.0032 on fastboostingpoint.com against $0.29 on lhfollowers.com; Instagram comments: $6.81 on fastboostingpoint.com against $7.49 on lhfollowers.com. fastboostingpoint.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
fastboostingpoint.com since 2022, 97K orders on its counter; lhfollowers.com since 2022, 61K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
fastboostingpoint.com: unclaimed, rated 3.9 across 5 reviews, Trust Score 56. lhfollowers.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 54. fastboostingpoint.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.