fiverr99.com vs qifudail.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 29, 2026.
| 2 panels |
35/ 100 · Guarded
|
35/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2018 | 2015 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 2,501 | 3,659 |
| Lowest price | $0.0045 per 1,000 | $0.003 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 3.0 of 5 · 3 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: qifudail.com 8 · fiverr99.com 4
| Service |  fiverr99.com |  qifudail.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.365 | $1.12 |
| Instagram likes | $0.019 | $0.076 |
| Instagram views | $0.0048 | $0.003 |
| Instagram comments | $1.22 | $0.811 |
| Instagram shares | $0.015 | $0.036 |
| TikTok followers | $1.34 | $0.941 |
| TikTok likes | $0.35 | $0.031 |
| TikTok views | $0.022 | $0.015 |
| TikTok comments | $0.50 | $1.97 |
| YouTube likes | $0.375 | $0.253 |
| YouTube views | $0.953 | $0.734 |
| YouTube comments | $3.49 | $3.46 |
| Telegram likes | $0.038 | $1.30 |
| Telegram views | $0.0045 | $0.003 |
| Telegram members | $0.036 | $0.228 |
| Telegram comments | $2.63 | $1.98 |
| Facebook followers | $0.11 | $0.454 |
| Facebook likes | $0.135 | $0.174 |
| Facebook views | $0.0088 | $0.055 |
| Facebook members | $1.50 | $0.563 |
| Facebook comments | $1.73 | $2.84 |
| Facebook shares | $0.027 | $0.908 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.563 | $2.07 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.169 | $1.24 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0057 | $0.003 |
| Twitter / X comments | $37.50 | $37.44 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.056 | $1.95 |
| LinkedIn likes | $14.03 | $6.23 |
| LinkedIn comments | $47.24 | $7.78 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
fiverr99.com vs qifudail.com: questions and answers
Answers about fiverr99.com vs qifudail.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 29, 2026.
fiverr99.com and qifudail.com both score 35 of 100 on the Trust Score. qifudail.com is the older of the two, online since 2015; fiverr99.com since 2018. fiverr99.com lists 2,501 services from $0.0045 per 1,000, qifudail.com 3,659 from $0.003. On the 8 services both sell, qifudail.com is cheaper on 5. fiverr99.com is rated 3.0 of 5 across 3 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of qifudail.com there. Of the 4 measures compared, qifudail.com leads 3 and fiverr99.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.365 on fiverr99.com against $1.12 on qifudail.com; Instagram likes: $0.019 on fiverr99.com against $0.076 on qifudail.com; Instagram views: $0.0048 on fiverr99.com against $0.003 on qifudail.com; Instagram comments: $1.22 on fiverr99.com against $0.811 on qifudail.com. qifudail.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
fiverr99.com since 2018, no public counter; qifudail.com since 2015, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
fiverr99.com: unclaimed, rated 3.0 across 3 reviews, Trust Score 35. qifudail.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 35. qifudail.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.