fiverr99.com vs rates-beater.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 23, 2026.
| 2 panels |
35/ 100 · Guarded
|
49/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2018 | 2019 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 2,502 | 872 |
| Lowest price | $0.0045 per 1,000 | $0.0009 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 3.0 of 5 · 3 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: fiverr99.com 7 · rates-beater.com 5
| Service |  fiverr99.com |  rates-beater.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.365 | $0.42 |
| Instagram likes | $0.019 | $0.044 |
| Instagram views | $0.0048 | $0.0019 |
| Instagram comments | $1.22 | $2.31 |
| Instagram shares | $0.015 | $0.12 |
| TikTok followers | $1.34 | $1.72 |
| TikTok likes | $0.35 | $0.18 |
| TikTok views | $0.022 | $0.0009 |
| TikTok comments | $0.50 | $7.20 |
| YouTube likes | $0.375 | $0.75 |
| YouTube views | $0.953 | $0.48 |
| YouTube shares | $0.938 | $0.63 |
| Telegram likes | $0.038 | $0.02 |
| Telegram views | $0.0045 | $0.0036 |
| Telegram members | $0.036 | $0.14 |
| Telegram comments | $2.63 | $2.04 |
| Facebook followers | $0.11 | $0.69 |
| Facebook likes | $0.135 | $0.72 |
| Facebook views | $0.0088 | $0.09 |
| Facebook members | $1.50 | $1.50 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.563 | $2.20 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.169 | $0.48 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0057 | $0.005 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.056 | $0.90 |
| Spotify followers | $0.319 | $0.25 |
| Spotify views | $0.188 | $0.23 |
| Twitch views | $0.75 | $14.88 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
fiverr99.com against…
fiverr99.com vs rates-beater.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about fiverr99.com vs rates-beater.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 23, 2026.
rates-beater.com scores 49 of 100 on the Trust Score, fiverr99.com 35 — a 14-point gap. fiverr99.com is the older of the two, online since 2018; rates-beater.com since 2019. fiverr99.com lists 2,502 services from $0.0045 per 1,000, rates-beater.com 872 from $0.0009. On the 8 services both sell, fiverr99.com is cheaper on 5. fiverr99.com is rated 3.0 of 5 across 3 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of rates-beater.com there. Of the 5 measures compared, fiverr99.com leads 4 and rates-beater.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.365 on fiverr99.com against $0.42 on rates-beater.com; Instagram likes: $0.019 on fiverr99.com against $0.044 on rates-beater.com; Instagram views: $0.0048 on fiverr99.com against $0.0019 on rates-beater.com; Instagram comments: $1.22 on fiverr99.com against $2.31 on rates-beater.com. fiverr99.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
fiverr99.com since 2018, no public counter; rates-beater.com since 2019, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
fiverr99.com: unclaimed, rated 3.0 across 3 reviews, Trust Score 35. rates-beater.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. fiverr99.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.