followadd.com vs socialmmpro.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 17, 2026.
| 2 panels |
59/ 100 · Solid
|
59/ 100 · Solid
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,449 | 1,034 |
| Lowest price | $0.0019 per 1,000 | $0.0032 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 226,869 orders | 356,920 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 18 a day (+528 over 30 days) | about 31 a day (+918 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: followadd.com 8 · socialmmpro.com 4
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.603 | $0.455 |
| Instagram likes | $0.057 | $0.144 |
| Instagram views | $0.0019 | $0.0033 |
| Instagram comments | $4.85 | $9.72 |
| Instagram shares | $0.331 | $0.024 |
| TikTok followers | $1.99 | $2.15 |
| TikTok likes | $0.04 | $0.525 |
| TikTok views | $0.0074 | $0.044 |
| YouTube likes | $0.497 | $1.39 |
| YouTube views | $0.133 | $1.36 |
| YouTube comments | $5.80 | $2.47 |
| Telegram likes | $1.99 | $0.146 |
| Telegram views | $0.0084 | $0.025 |
| Telegram members | $0.163 | $0.599 |
| Telegram comments | $2.48 | $7.50 |
| Facebook followers | $0.222 | $0.855 |
| Facebook likes | $0.151 | $0.26 |
| Facebook views | $0.0087 | $1.52 |
| Facebook members | $0.351 | $0.615 |
| Facebook comments | $8.28 | $6.25 |
| Facebook shares | $82.81 | $1.26 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.24 | $1.50 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.155 | $1.92 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0034 | $0.0032 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
followadd.com against…
followadd.com vs socialmmpro.com: questions and answers
Answers about followadd.com vs socialmmpro.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 17, 2026.
followadd.com and socialmmpro.com both score 59 of 100 on the Trust Score. followadd.com is the older of the two, online since 2017; socialmmpro.com since 2019. followadd.com lists 1,449 services from $0.0019 per 1,000, socialmmpro.com 1,034 from $0.0032. On the 8 services both sell, followadd.com is cheaper on 6. followadd.com's public counter stands at 227K orders (about 18 a day (+528 over 30 days)), socialmmpro.com's at 357K (about 31 a day (+918 over 30 days)). Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, followadd.com leads 3 and socialmmpro.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.603 on followadd.com against $0.455 on socialmmpro.com; Instagram likes: $0.057 on followadd.com against $0.144 on socialmmpro.com; Instagram views: $0.0019 on followadd.com against $0.0033 on socialmmpro.com; Instagram comments: $4.85 on followadd.com against $9.72 on socialmmpro.com. followadd.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
followadd.com since 2017, 227K orders on its counter; socialmmpro.com since 2019, 357K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
followadd.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 59. socialmmpro.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 59. followadd.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.