fornecedorbrasil.com vs tghaodi.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 25, 2026.
| 2 panels |
29/ 100 · Guarded
|
29/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 3,090 | 1,010 |
| Lowest price | $0.0019 per 1,000 | $0.003 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 3.0 of 5 · 1 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: fornecedorbrasil.com 9 · tghaodi.com 3
| Service |  fornecedorbrasil.com |  tghaodi.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.415 | $0.865 |
| Instagram likes | $0.031 | $0.097 |
| Instagram views | $0.0019 | $0.003 |
| Instagram comments | $0.446 | $0.335 |
| TikTok followers | $1.04 | $2.09 |
| TikTok likes | $0.048 | $0.287 |
| TikTok views | $0.0097 | $0.033 |
| YouTube likes | $0.45 | $0.831 |
| YouTube views | $0.083 | $0.63 |
| YouTube shares | $1.26 | $0.484 |
| Telegram views | $0.0097 | $0.015 |
| Telegram members | $0.242 | $0.24 |
| Facebook followers | $0.199 | $0.176 |
| Facebook likes | $0.327 | $0.40 |
| Facebook views | $0.029 | $0.046 |
| Facebook members | $2.03 | $0.32 |
| Facebook comments | $2.86 | $11.25 |
| Facebook shares | $0.982 | $0.639 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.62 | $0.863 |
| Twitter / X likes | $4.36 | $1.62 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0077 | $0.0045 |
| LinkedIn followers | $7.56 | $12.79 |
| LinkedIn likes | $16.85 | $26.52 |
| Kwai followers | $1.30 | $2.34 |
| Kwai likes | $0.653 | $1.04 |
| Kwai views | $0.696 | $0.368 |
| Kwai shares | $0.908 | $1.20 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
fornecedorbrasil.com against…
fornecedorbrasil.com vs tghaodi.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about fornecedorbrasil.com vs tghaodi.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 25, 2026.
fornecedorbrasil.com and tghaodi.com both score 29 of 100 on the Trust Score. Both have been online since 2022. fornecedorbrasil.com lists 3,090 services from $0.0019 per 1,000, tghaodi.com 1,010 from $0.003. On the 8 services both sell, fornecedorbrasil.com is cheaper on 7. fornecedorbrasil.com is rated 3.0 of 5 across 1 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of tghaodi.com there. Of the 3 measures compared, fornecedorbrasil.com leads 3. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.415 on fornecedorbrasil.com against $0.865 on tghaodi.com; Instagram likes: $0.031 on fornecedorbrasil.com against $0.097 on tghaodi.com; Instagram views: $0.0019 on fornecedorbrasil.com against $0.003 on tghaodi.com; Instagram comments: $0.446 on fornecedorbrasil.com against $0.335 on tghaodi.com. fornecedorbrasil.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
fornecedorbrasil.com since 2022, no public counter; tghaodi.com since 2022, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
fornecedorbrasil.com: unclaimed, rated 3.0 across 1 reviews, Trust Score 29. tghaodi.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 29. fornecedorbrasil.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.