gainfast.net vs tokeyfollower.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 17, 2026.
| 2 panels |
49/ 100 · Fair
|
49/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2023 | 2019 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 3,361 | 1,072 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.01 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 8,048 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 4 a day (+107 over 30 days) | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: gainfast.net 10 · tokeyfollower.com 1
| Service |  gainfast.net |  tokeyfollower.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.84 | $1.97 |
| Instagram likes | $0.09 | $0.10 |
| Instagram views | $0.01 | $0.01 |
| Instagram comments | $8.75 | $3.30 |
| Instagram shares | $0.01 | $3.24 |
| TikTok followers | $4.94 | $8.50 |
| TikTok likes | $0.25 | $0.67 |
| TikTok views | $0.05 | $0.13 |
| TikTok comments | $0.18 | $6.60 |
| TikTok shares | $0.04 | $0.56 |
| YouTube likes | $0.48 | $2.53 |
| YouTube views | $1.10 | $2.60 |
| YouTube subscribers | $46.88 | $3.86 |
| YouTube shares | $2.33 | $5.90 |
| Telegram likes | $0.08 | $0.22 |
| Telegram views | $0.02 | $0.10 |
| Telegram members | $0.73 | $1.39 |
| Facebook followers | $0.30 | $2.01 |
| Facebook likes | $0.20 | $1.61 |
| Facebook views | $0.08 | $0.943 |
| Facebook comments | $26.88 | $209.36 |
| Twitter / X followers | $2.70 | $5.15 |
| Twitter / X likes | $3.38 | $5.26 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.85 | $5.16 |
| Spotify followers | $0.66 | $3.91 |
| Spotify views | $0.26 | $2.47 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
gainfast.net against…
gainfast.net vs tokeyfollower.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about gainfast.net vs tokeyfollower.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 17, 2026.
gainfast.net and tokeyfollower.com both score 49 of 100 on the Trust Score. tokeyfollower.com is the older of the two, online since 2019; gainfast.net since 2023. gainfast.net lists 3,361 services from $0.01 per 1,000, tokeyfollower.com 1,072 from $0.01. On the 8 services both sell, gainfast.net is cheaper on 6. gainfast.net shows a public counter — 8,048 orders, about 4 a day (+107 over 30 days) — while tokeyfollower.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, gainfast.net leads 4 and tokeyfollower.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.84 on gainfast.net against $1.97 on tokeyfollower.com; Instagram likes: $0.09 on gainfast.net against $0.10 on tokeyfollower.com; Instagram views: $0.01 on gainfast.net against $0.01 on tokeyfollower.com; Instagram comments: $8.75 on gainfast.net against $3.30 on tokeyfollower.com. gainfast.net is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
gainfast.net since 2023, 8,048 orders on its counter; tokeyfollower.com since 2019, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
gainfast.net: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. tokeyfollower.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. gainfast.net has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.