gramfamaoficial.com.br vs refmidiasocial.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 8, 2026.
| 2 panels |
52/ 100 · Fair
|
46/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 101 | 116 |
| Lowest price | $0.0018 per 1,000 | $0.0036 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 2,019,200 orders | 17,696 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 271 a day (+8,120 over 30 days) | about 35 a day (+1,061 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: gramfamaoficial.com.br 11 · refmidiasocial.com 1
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.978 | $1.72 |
| Instagram likes | $0.164 | $0.40 |
| Instagram views | $0.0091 | $0.247 |
| Instagram shares | $0.011 | $0.469 |
| TikTok followers | $2.64 | $3.33 |
| TikTok likes | $0.582 | $0.763 |
| TikTok views | $0.033 | $0.145 |
| TikTok comments | $27.26 | $1.89 |
| YouTube likes | $4.00 | $9.09 |
| YouTube views | $0.322 | $1.37 |
| Facebook followers | $0.298 | $1.47 |
| Facebook likes | $0.472 | $1.18 |
| Facebook views | $0.867 | $0.109 |
| Kwai followers | $0.665 | $1.25 |
| Other followers | $0.723 | $2.91 |
| Kwai likes | $0.28 | $0.738 |
| Other views | $0.0018 | $0.0036 |
| Kwai views | $0.291 | $0.687 |
| Kwai comments | $3.82 | $2.16 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
gramfamaoficial.com.br against…
gramfamaoficial.com.br vs refmidiasocial.com: questions and answers
Answers about gramfamaoficial.com.br vs refmidiasocial.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 8, 2026.
gramfamaoficial.com.br scores 52 of 100 on the Trust Score, refmidiasocial.com 46 — a 6-point gap. gramfamaoficial.com.br is the older of the two, online since 2023; refmidiasocial.com since 2024. gramfamaoficial.com.br lists 101 services from $0.0018 per 1,000, refmidiasocial.com 116 from $0.0036. On the 8 services both sell, gramfamaoficial.com.br is cheaper on 7. gramfamaoficial.com.br's public counter stands at 2M orders (about 271 a day (+8,120 over 30 days)), refmidiasocial.com's at 18K (about 35 a day (+1,061 over 30 days)). Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 6 measures compared, gramfamaoficial.com.br leads 5 and refmidiasocial.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.978 on gramfamaoficial.com.br against $1.72 on refmidiasocial.com; Instagram likes: $0.164 on gramfamaoficial.com.br against $0.40 on refmidiasocial.com; Instagram views: $0.0091 on gramfamaoficial.com.br against $0.247 on refmidiasocial.com; Instagram shares: $0.011 on gramfamaoficial.com.br against $0.469 on refmidiasocial.com. gramfamaoficial.com.br is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
gramfamaoficial.com.br since 2023, 2M orders on its counter; refmidiasocial.com since 2024, 18K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
gramfamaoficial.com.br: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 52. refmidiasocial.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 46. gramfamaoficial.com.br has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.