jetbayi.com vs smmswaqly.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 27, 2026.
| 2 panels |
13/ 100 · Weak
|
11/ 100 · Weak
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 4,500 | 1,335 |
| Lowest price | $0.0002 per 1,000 | $0.0009 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 3.0 of 5 · 2 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmswaqly.com 10 · jetbayi.com 2
| Service |  jetbayi.com |  smmswaqly.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.675 | $0.305 |
| Instagram likes | $0.12 | $0.071 |
| Instagram views | $0.0002 | $0.0014 |
| Instagram comments | $1.09 | $0.821 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0037 | $0.0009 |
| TikTok followers | $2.59 | $1.19 |
| TikTok likes | $0.058 | $0.017 |
| TikTok views | $0.029 | $0.01 |
| TikTok comments | $2.36 | $0.162 |
| YouTube likes | $1.80 | $1.02 |
| YouTube views | $1.03 | $0.068 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.029 | $0.531 |
| YouTube comments | $7.66 | $1.69 |
| Telegram views | $0.0037 | $0.0027 |
| Telegram members | $0.088 | $0.24 |
| Telegram comments | $5.44 | $5.39 |
| Facebook followers | $0.44 | $0.147 |
| Facebook likes | $0.399 | $0.131 |
| Facebook views | $0.091 | $0.033 |
| Facebook members | $0.616 | $0.292 |
| Facebook comments | $2.20 | $2.14 |
| Twitter / X followers | $2.02 | $4.05 |
| Twitter / X likes | $2.66 | $1.28 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.011 | $0.0016 |
| Twitter / X comments | $61.33 | $7.04 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.363 | $0.18 |
| Snapchat followers | $32.66 | $19.49 |
| Kick followers | $1.81 | $1.56 |
| Other followers | $2.02 | $0.164 |
| Other likes | $2.90 | $0.035 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
jetbayi.com vs smmswaqly.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about jetbayi.com vs smmswaqly.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 27, 2026.
jetbayi.com scores 13 of 100 on the Trust Score, smmswaqly.com 11 — a 2-point gap. Both have been online since 2025. jetbayi.com lists 4,500 services from $0.0002 per 1,000, smmswaqly.com 1,335 from $0.0009. On the 8 services both sell, smmswaqly.com is cheaper on 7. jetbayi.com is rated 3.0 of 5 across 2 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of smmswaqly.com there. Of the 4 measures compared, jetbayi.com leads 3 and smmswaqly.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.675 on jetbayi.com against $0.305 on smmswaqly.com; Instagram likes: $0.12 on jetbayi.com against $0.071 on smmswaqly.com; Instagram views: $0.0002 on jetbayi.com against $0.0014 on smmswaqly.com; Instagram comments: $1.09 on jetbayi.com against $0.821 on smmswaqly.com. smmswaqly.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
jetbayi.com since 2025, no public counter; smmswaqly.com since 2025, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
jetbayi.com: unclaimed, rated 3.0 across 2 reviews, Trust Score 13. smmswaqly.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 11. jetbayi.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.