justsmm.com vs socialmediaservices.shop
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 4, 2026.
| 2 panels |
49/ 100 · Fair
|
49/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 543 | 4,793 |
| Lowest price | $0.001 per 1,000 | $1.01 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 10,555 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 610 a day (+6,104 over 10 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: justsmm.com 11 · socialmediaservices.shop 1
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram likes | $0.138 | $1.15 |
| Instagram views | $0.001 | $1.01 |
| Instagram comments | $0.73 | $2.63 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0013 | $1.50 |
| TikTok followers | $2.34 | $2.33 |
| TikTok likes | $0.845 | $1.65 |
| TikTok views | $0.178 | $1.11 |
| YouTube likes | $0.275 | $2.35 |
| YouTube views | $0.407 | $1.78 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.53 | $1.66 |
| YouTube comments | $5.09 | $9.12 |
| Telegram likes | $0.031 | $1.09 |
| Telegram views | $0.0028 | $1.02 |
| Telegram members | $0.246 | $1.24 |
| Facebook followers | $0.205 | $1.38 |
| Facebook likes | $0.154 | $1.57 |
| Facebook views | $0.033 | $1.26 |
| Facebook comments | $4.08 | $9.06 |
| Facebook shares | $1.48 | $4.28 |
| Twitter / X followers | $5.09 | $2.44 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.042 | $1.02 |
| Spotify followers | $6.50 | $2.04 |
| Spotify views | $0.546 | $1.53 |
| WhatsApp members | $2.99 | $17.13 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
justsmm.com against…
justsmm.com vs socialmediaservices.shop: questions and answers
Answers about justsmm.com vs socialmediaservices.shop from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 4, 2026.
justsmm.com and socialmediaservices.shop both score 49 of 100 on the Trust Score. socialmediaservices.shop is the older of the two, online since 2019; justsmm.com since 2020. justsmm.com lists 543 services from $0.001 per 1,000, socialmediaservices.shop 4,793 from $1.01. On the 8 services both sell, justsmm.com is cheaper on 7. socialmediaservices.shop shows a public counter — 11K orders, about 610 a day (+6,104 over 10 days) — while justsmm.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, socialmediaservices.shop leads 4 and justsmm.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram likes: $0.138 on justsmm.com against $1.15 on socialmediaservices.shop; Instagram views: $0.001 on justsmm.com against $1.01 on socialmediaservices.shop; Instagram comments: $0.73 on justsmm.com against $2.63 on socialmediaservices.shop; Instagram shares: $0.0013 on justsmm.com against $1.50 on socialmediaservices.shop. justsmm.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
justsmm.com since 2020, no public counter; socialmediaservices.shop since 2019, 11K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
justsmm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. socialmediaservices.shop: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. socialmediaservices.shop has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.