kingofbots.io vs smmfastboost.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 27, 2026.
| 2 panels |
41/ 100 · Guarded
|
41/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 4,235 | 378 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.0018 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 8,334 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 143 a day (+4,291 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: kingofbots.io 7 · smmfastboost.com 5
| Service |  kingofbots.io |  smmfastboost.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram likes | $0.05 | $0.208 |
| Instagram views | $0.03 | $0.021 |
| Instagram comments | $12.81 | $1.25 |
| Instagram shares | $0.05 | $0.166 |
| TikTok followers | $4.38 | $7.00 |
| TikTok likes | $0.06 | $0.501 |
| TikTok views | $0.03 | $0.013 |
| YouTube likes | $0.22 | $0.719 |
| YouTube views | $1.58 | $0.839 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.31 | $21.57 |
| YouTube comments | $13.61 | $1.65 |
| Telegram likes | $0.09 | $0.285 |
| Telegram views | $0.02 | $0.046 |
| Telegram members | $0.63 | $0.296 |
| Facebook followers | $1.22 | $0.163 |
| Facebook likes | $1.21 | $0.166 |
| Facebook views | $0.10 | $0.037 |
| Facebook members | $2.65 | $0.429 |
| Facebook comments | $35.00 | $2.64 |
| Facebook shares | $2.39 | $1.33 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.75 | $1.20 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.44 | $5.96 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.02 | $0.0018 |
| Twitter / X comments | $45.50 | $8.45 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.44 | $19.87 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
kingofbots.io against…
kingofbots.io vs smmfastboost.com: questions and answers
Answers about kingofbots.io vs smmfastboost.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 27, 2026.
kingofbots.io and smmfastboost.com both score 41 of 100 on the Trust Score. smmfastboost.com is the older of the two, online since 2022; kingofbots.io since 2023. kingofbots.io lists 4,235 services from $0.01 per 1,000, smmfastboost.com 378 from $0.0018. On the 8 services both sell, kingofbots.io is cheaper on 5. smmfastboost.com shows a public counter — 8,334 orders, about 143 a day (+4,291 over 30 days) — while kingofbots.io shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, smmfastboost.com leads 3 and kingofbots.io 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram likes: $0.05 on kingofbots.io against $0.208 on smmfastboost.com; Instagram views: $0.03 on kingofbots.io against $0.021 on smmfastboost.com; Instagram comments: $12.81 on kingofbots.io against $1.25 on smmfastboost.com; Instagram shares: $0.05 on kingofbots.io against $0.166 on smmfastboost.com. kingofbots.io is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
kingofbots.io since 2023, no public counter; smmfastboost.com since 2022, 8,334 orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
kingofbots.io: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 41. smmfastboost.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 41. smmfastboost.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.