likeprovider.net vs sfollowers.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 5, 2026.
| 2 panels |
46/ 100 · Fair
|
46/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,142 | 6,090 |
| Lowest price | $0.0009 per 1,000 | $0.01 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 4.0 of 5 · 2 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | offline |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: likeprovider.net 10 · sfollowers.com 1
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.25 | $0.38 |
| Instagram likes | $0.015 | $0.03 |
| Instagram views | $0.0016 | $0.01 |
| Instagram members | $0.99 | $1.37 |
| Instagram comments | $0.49 | $0.37 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0088 | $0.02 |
| TikTok followers | $0.79 | $2.49 |
| TikTok likes | $0.038 | $0.10 |
| TikTok views | $0.029 | $0.03 |
| TikTok comments | $0.23 | $1.52 |
| TikTok shares | $0.07 | $0.07 |
| YouTube likes | $0.17 | $0.28 |
| YouTube views | $0.14 | $0.63 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.02 | $32.27 |
| YouTube comments | $2.04 | $4.05 |
| Telegram views | $0.0009 | $0.01 |
| Telegram members | $0.295 | $0.28 |
| Facebook followers | $0.25 | $0.49 |
| Facebook likes | $0.10 | $0.18 |
| Facebook views | $0.02 | $0.05 |
| Facebook members | $0.25 | $0.85 |
| Facebook comments | $0.25 | $0.39 |
| Facebook shares | $0.036 | $0.04 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.24 | $6.90 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.88 | $0.43 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0045 | $0.01 |
| Twitter / X comments | $13.80 | $29.78 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.45 | $0.25 |
| Spotify views | $0.37 | $0.29 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
likeprovider.net against…
likeprovider.net vs sfollowers.com: questions and answers
Answers about likeprovider.net vs sfollowers.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 5, 2026.
likeprovider.net and sfollowers.com both score 46 of 100 on the Trust Score. Both have been online since 2021. likeprovider.net lists 1,142 services from $0.0009 per 1,000, sfollowers.com 6,090 from $0.01. On the 8 services both sell, likeprovider.net is cheaper on 7. likeprovider.net is rated 4.0 of 5 across 2 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of sfollowers.com there. Of the 3 measures compared, likeprovider.net leads 2 and sfollowers.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.25 on likeprovider.net against $0.38 on sfollowers.com; Instagram likes: $0.015 on likeprovider.net against $0.03 on sfollowers.com; Instagram views: $0.0016 on likeprovider.net against $0.01 on sfollowers.com; Instagram members: $0.99 on likeprovider.net against $1.37 on sfollowers.com. likeprovider.net is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
likeprovider.net since 2021, no public counter; sfollowers.com since 2021, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
likeprovider.net: unclaimed, rated 4.0 across 2 reviews, Trust Score 46. sfollowers.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 46. likeprovider.net has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.