marketfollowers.com vs prixsmm.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 25, 2026.
| 2 panels |
45/ 100 · Fair
|
46/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 213 | 1,542 |
| Lowest price | $0.0027 per 1,000 | $0.0007 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 2,068,924 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 660 a day (+19,811 over 30 days) | — |
| User rating | 2.9 of 5 · 35 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: prixsmm.com 12
| Service |  marketfollowers.com |  prixsmm.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $1.69 | $0.337 |
| Instagram likes | $0.40 | $0.05 |
| Instagram views | $0.0027 | $0.0007 |
| Instagram comments | $10.53 | $0.217 |
| Instagram shares | $0.17 | $0.0007 |
| TikTok followers | $2.37 | $0.865 |
| TikTok likes | $0.42 | $0.105 |
| TikTok views | $0.09 | $0.0028 |
| YouTube likes | $1.80 | $0.355 |
| YouTube views | $1.51 | $0.36 |
| YouTube subscribers | $37.64 | $0.031 |
| YouTube comments | $4.40 | $1.73 |
| Telegram likes | $0.12 | $0.011 |
| Telegram views | $0.01 | $0.0014 |
| Telegram members | $0.82 | $0.169 |
| Facebook followers | $0.39 | $0.14 |
| Facebook likes | $0.41 | $0.122 |
| Facebook views | $0.24 | $0.021 |
| Facebook members | $1.01 | $0.253 |
| Facebook shares | $1.22 | $0.081 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.63 | $0.845 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.01 | $0.0012 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.04 | $1.44 |
| Twitch followers | $2.11 | $0.189 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
marketfollowers.com against…
marketfollowers.com vs prixsmm.com: questions and answers
Answers about marketfollowers.com vs prixsmm.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 25, 2026.
prixsmm.com scores 46 of 100 on the Trust Score, marketfollowers.com 45 — a 1-point gap. Both have been online since 2022. marketfollowers.com lists 213 services from $0.0027 per 1,000, prixsmm.com 1,542 from $0.0007. On the 8 services both sell, prixsmm.com is cheaper on 8. marketfollowers.com shows a public counter — 2.1M orders, about 660 a day (+19,811 over 30 days) — while prixsmm.com shows none. marketfollowers.com is rated 2.9 of 5 across 35 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of prixsmm.com there. The measures split evenly between the two — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $1.69 on marketfollowers.com against $0.337 on prixsmm.com; Instagram likes: $0.40 on marketfollowers.com against $0.05 on prixsmm.com; Instagram views: $0.0027 on marketfollowers.com against $0.0007 on prixsmm.com; Instagram comments: $10.53 on marketfollowers.com against $0.217 on prixsmm.com. prixsmm.com is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
marketfollowers.com since 2022, 2.1M orders on its counter; prixsmm.com since 2022, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
marketfollowers.com: unclaimed, rated 2.9 across 35 reviews, Trust Score 45. prixsmm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 46. prixsmm.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.