marketfollowers.com vs smmset.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 10, 2026.
| 2 panels |
45/ 100 · Fair
|
51/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 221 | 673 |
| Lowest price | $0.0027 per 1,000 | $0.001 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 2,059,534 orders | 9,904,526 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 702 a day (+21,073 over 30 days) | about 9,949 a day (+228,816 over 23 days) |
| User rating | 2.9 of 5 · 35 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmset.com 12
| Service |  marketfollowers.com |  smmset.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $2.73 | $0.433 |
| Instagram likes | $0.12 | $0.063 |
| Instagram views | $0.0027 | $0.0011 |
| Instagram comments | $10.53 | $0.432 |
| Instagram shares | $0.17 | $0.0013 |
| TikTok followers | $2.37 | $1.04 |
| TikTok likes | $0.42 | $0.296 |
| TikTok views | $0.09 | $0.0047 |
| YouTube likes | $1.80 | $0.501 |
| YouTube views | $1.51 | $0.431 |
| YouTube subscribers | $37.64 | $19.28 |
| YouTube comments | $4.40 | $3.06 |
| Telegram likes | $0.12 | $0.012 |
| Telegram views | $0.01 | $0.0012 |
| Telegram members | $0.61 | $0.047 |
| Facebook followers | $0.39 | $0.175 |
| Facebook likes | $0.41 | $0.296 |
| Facebook views | $0.24 | $0.039 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.63 | $7.99 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.01 | $0.001 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
marketfollowers.com against…
marketfollowers.com vs smmset.com: questions and answers
Answers about marketfollowers.com vs smmset.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 10, 2026.
smmset.com scores 51 of 100 on the Trust Score, marketfollowers.com 45 — a 6-point gap. marketfollowers.com is the older of the two, online since 2022; smmset.com since 2024. marketfollowers.com lists 221 services from $0.0027 per 1,000, smmset.com 673 from $0.001. On the 8 services both sell, smmset.com is cheaper on 8. marketfollowers.com's public counter stands at 2.1M orders (about 702 a day (+21,073 over 30 days)), smmset.com's at 9.9M (about 9,949 a day (+228,816 over 23 days)). marketfollowers.com is rated 2.9 of 5 across 35 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of smmset.com there. Of the 7 measures compared, smmset.com leads 5 and marketfollowers.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $2.73 on marketfollowers.com against $0.433 on smmset.com; Instagram likes: $0.12 on marketfollowers.com against $0.063 on smmset.com; Instagram views: $0.0027 on marketfollowers.com against $0.0011 on smmset.com; Instagram comments: $10.53 on marketfollowers.com against $0.432 on smmset.com. smmset.com is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
marketfollowers.com since 2022, 2.1M orders on its counter; smmset.com since 2024, 9.9M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
marketfollowers.com: unclaimed, rated 2.9 across 35 reviews, Trust Score 45. smmset.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 51. smmset.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.