medyacafemx.com vs prm4u.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 25, 2026.
| 2 panels |
17/ 100 · Weak
|
84/ 100 · Strong
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 127 | 1,815 |
| Lowest price | $0.0051 per 1,000 | $0.0009 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 33,725,016 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 12,187 a day (+365,604 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | 4.8 of 5 · 73 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Slashdot, Product Hunt, Sitejabber, RealReviews |
| Owner | unclaimed | verified · TrustPanel |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Payment methods | unknown | Visa / Mastercard, USDT / BTC / ETH, Binance Pay, Cryptomus, Heleket, Alipay, UPI, Paytm, Bank transfer |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: prm4u.com 7 · medyacafemx.com 5
| Service |  medyacafemx.com |  prm4u.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $3.07 | $0.18 |
| Instagram likes | $0.445 | $0.036 |
| Instagram views | $0.0051 | $0.0018 |
| Instagram comments | $1.15 | $4.50 |
| TikTok followers | $3.00 | $2.70 |
| TikTok likes | $0.142 | $0.27 |
| TikTok views | $0.028 | $0.036 |
| YouTube likes | $1.19 | $1.80 |
| YouTube views | $1.27 | $0.36 |
| YouTube subscribers | $5.62 | $4.50 |
| Telegram views | $0.02 | $0.0009 |
| Facebook likes | $0.367 | $0.45 |
| Facebook views | $0.097 | $0.09 |
| Twitter / X comments | $47.04 | $4.50 |
| Spotify followers | $0.623 | $0.119 |
| LinkedIn followers | $50.96 | $4.50 |
| LinkedIn likes | $17.13 | $3.60 |
| WhatsApp likes | $0.054 | $1.35 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
medyacafemx.com vs prm4u.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about medyacafemx.com vs prm4u.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 25, 2026.
prm4u.com scores 84 of 100 on the Trust Score, medyacafemx.com 17 — a 67-point gap. prm4u.com is the older of the two, online since 2020; medyacafemx.com since 2025. medyacafemx.com lists 127 services from $0.0051 per 1,000, prm4u.com 1,815 from $0.0009. On the 8 services both sell, neither is cheaper overall. prm4u.com shows a public counter — 34M orders, about 12,187 a day (+365,604 over 30 days) — while medyacafemx.com shows none. prm4u.com is rated 4.8 of 5 across 73 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of medyacafemx.com there. prm4u.com's owner has verified the listing on smm.guide; medyacafemx.com is unclaimed. Of the 6 measures compared, prm4u.com leads 6. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $3.07 on medyacafemx.com against $0.18 on prm4u.com; Instagram likes: $0.445 on medyacafemx.com against $0.036 on prm4u.com; Instagram views: $0.0051 on medyacafemx.com against $0.0018 on prm4u.com; Instagram comments: $1.15 on medyacafemx.com against $4.50 on prm4u.com. Neither is cheaper overall; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
medyacafemx.com since 2025, no public counter; prm4u.com since 2020, 34M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
medyacafemx.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 17. prm4u.com: owner verified, rated 4.8 across 73 reviews, Trust Score 84. prm4u.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.