padooinsta.com vs trend-smm.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 10, 2026.
| 2 panels |
44/ 100 · Fair
|
45/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 2,266 | 347 |
| Lowest price | $1.22 per 1,000 | $0.01 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 31,224 orders | 9,192 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 4 a day (+116 over 30 days) | about 1 a day (+21 over 30 days) |
| User rating | 3.2 of 5 · 1 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: trend-smm.com 10 · padooinsta.com 2
| Service |  padooinsta.com |  trend-smm.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $8.72 | $4.20 |
| Instagram likes | $1.64 | $0.67 |
| Instagram views | $1.22 | $0.01 |
| Instagram comments | $7.16 | $8.52 |
| TikTok followers | $14.84 | $4.73 |
| TikTok likes | $2.56 | $53.20 |
| TikTok views | $1.40 | $0.05 |
| YouTube likes | $3.81 | $1.54 |
| YouTube views | $3.07 | $1.29 |
| Telegram likes | $1.29 | $0.08 |
| Telegram views | $1.22 | $0.08 |
| Telegram members | $2.11 | $0.60 |
| Facebook likes | $3.64 | $3.04 |
| Facebook views | $1.41 | $0.17 |
| Facebook shares | $9.72 | $1.98 |
| Twitter / X followers | $10.42 | $3.39 |
| Twitter / X likes | $4.19 | $34.96 |
| Twitter / X comments | $79.19 | $60.80 |
| Twitter / X shares | $12.08 | $1.22 |
| Spotify followers | $2.42 | $1.69 |
| Spotify views | $2.40 | $4.63 |
| Twitch followers | $2.30 | $0.19 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
padooinsta.com against…
padooinsta.com vs trend-smm.com: questions and answers
Answers about padooinsta.com vs trend-smm.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 10, 2026.
trend-smm.com scores 45 of 100 on the Trust Score, padooinsta.com 44 — a 1-point gap. padooinsta.com is the older of the two, online since 2020; trend-smm.com since 2024. padooinsta.com lists 2,266 services from $1.22 per 1,000, trend-smm.com 347 from $0.01. On the 8 services both sell, trend-smm.com is cheaper on 6. padooinsta.com's public counter stands at 31K orders (about 4 a day (+116 over 30 days)), trend-smm.com's at 9,192 (about 1 a day (+21 over 30 days)). padooinsta.com is rated 3.2 of 5 across 1 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of trend-smm.com there. Of the 7 measures compared, padooinsta.com leads 5 and trend-smm.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $8.72 on padooinsta.com against $4.20 on trend-smm.com; Instagram likes: $1.64 on padooinsta.com against $0.67 on trend-smm.com; Instagram views: $1.22 on padooinsta.com against $0.01 on trend-smm.com; Instagram comments: $7.16 on padooinsta.com against $8.52 on trend-smm.com. trend-smm.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
padooinsta.com since 2020, 31K orders on its counter; trend-smm.com since 2024, 9,192 orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
padooinsta.com: unclaimed, rated 3.2 across 1 reviews, Trust Score 44. trend-smm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 45. padooinsta.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.