piarpanelpro.com vs smmlegend.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 4, 2026.
| 2 panels |
47/ 100 · Fair
|
47/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,265 | 891 |
| Lowest price | $0.0066 per 1,000 | $0.0008 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 1,256,303 orders | 5,865 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 133 a day (+3,995 over 30 days) | no growth read |
| User rating | no reviews read | 4.5 of 5 · 29 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmlegend.com 8 · piarpanelpro.com 4
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.479 | $0.196 |
| Instagram likes | $0.06 | $0.044 |
| Instagram views | $0.012 | $0.0008 |
| Instagram comments | $2.25 | $0.489 |
| TikTok followers | $0.814 | $0.954 |
| TikTok likes | $0.072 | $0.052 |
| TikTok views | $0.048 | $0.0026 |
| TikTok comments | $11.79 | $2.40 |
| YouTube likes | $0.347 | $0.739 |
| YouTube views | $0.395 | $1.04 |
| YouTube subscribers | $1.10 | $15.26 |
| YouTube comments | $2.25 | $1.12 |
| Telegram likes | $0.024 | $0.015 |
| Telegram views | $0.0066 | $0.0057 |
| Telegram members | $0.048 | $0.207 |
| Facebook followers | $0.395 | $0.112 |
| Facebook likes | $5.98 | $0.083 |
| Facebook views | $0.012 | $0.02 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.335 | $0.662 |
| Twitter / X likes | $2.36 | $0.662 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.024 | $0.0011 |
| Kick followers | $4.32 | $0.682 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
piarpanelpro.com against…
piarpanelpro.com vs smmlegend.com: questions and answers
Answers about piarpanelpro.com vs smmlegend.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 4, 2026.
piarpanelpro.com and smmlegend.com both score 47 of 100 on the Trust Score. piarpanelpro.com is the older of the two, online since 2018; smmlegend.com since 2025. piarpanelpro.com lists 1,265 services from $0.0066 per 1,000, smmlegend.com 891 from $0.0008. On the 8 services both sell, smmlegend.com is cheaper on 7. piarpanelpro.com's public counter stands at 1.3M orders (about 133 a day (+3,995 over 30 days)), smmlegend.com's at 5,865. smmlegend.com is rated 4.5 of 5 across 29 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of piarpanelpro.com there. Of the 6 measures compared, piarpanelpro.com leads 4 and smmlegend.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.479 on piarpanelpro.com against $0.196 on smmlegend.com; Instagram likes: $0.06 on piarpanelpro.com against $0.044 on smmlegend.com; Instagram views: $0.012 on piarpanelpro.com against $0.0008 on smmlegend.com; Instagram comments: $2.25 on piarpanelpro.com against $0.489 on smmlegend.com. smmlegend.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
piarpanelpro.com since 2018, 1.3M orders on its counter; smmlegend.com since 2025, 5,865 orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
piarpanelpro.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 47. smmlegend.com: unclaimed, rated 4.5 across 29 reviews, Trust Score 47. piarpanelpro.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.