skmpanel.com vs themainsmm.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 2, 2026.
| 2 panels |
64/ 100 · Solid
|
58/ 100 · Solid
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,675 | 716 |
| Lowest price | $0.001 per 1,000 | $0.0004 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 444,624 orders | 9,828,274 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 620 a day (+18,610 over 30 days) | about 11,641 a day (+349,223 over 30 days) |
| User rating | 3.9 of 5 · 6 reviews | 1.8 of 5 · 13 reviews |
| Review platforms | Sitejabber, Trustpilot | Trustpilot, RatingFacts |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: themainsmm.com 6 · skmpanel.com 5
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $2.37 | $0.338 |
| Instagram likes | $0.053 | $0.062 |
| Instagram views | $0.001 | $0.001 |
| Instagram comments | $0.788 | $0.433 |
| Instagram shares | $0.013 | $0.0004 |
| TikTok followers | $4.14 | $1.04 |
| TikTok likes | $0.211 | $0.298 |
| TikTok views | $0.039 | $0.0032 |
| YouTube likes | $0.356 | $0.506 |
| YouTube views | $0.565 | $0.43 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.026 | $19.45 |
| YouTube comments | $2.62 | $3.09 |
| Facebook followers | $0.197 | $0.177 |
| Facebook likes | $0.329 | $0.298 |
| Facebook views | $0.039 | $0.04 |
| Facebook comments | $14.87 | $1.20 |
| Twitter / X followers | $3.78 | $8.02 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.013 | $0.001 |
| Twitter / X shares | $1.04 | $0.123 |
| Other likes | $0.552 | $0.043 |
| Other views | $0.0013 | $0.002 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
skmpanel.com against…
skmpanel.com vs themainsmm.com: questions and answers
Answers about skmpanel.com vs themainsmm.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 2, 2026.
skmpanel.com scores 64 of 100 on the Trust Score, themainsmm.com 58 — a 6-point gap. skmpanel.com is the older of the two, online since 2019; themainsmm.com since 2022. skmpanel.com lists 1,675 services from $0.001 per 1,000, themainsmm.com 716 from $0.0004. On the 8 services both sell, themainsmm.com is cheaper on 5. skmpanel.com's public counter stands at 445K orders (about 620 a day (+18,610 over 30 days)), themainsmm.com's at 9.8M (about 11,641 a day (+349,223 over 30 days)). Users rate skmpanel.com 3.9 of 5 across 6 reviews, themainsmm.com 1.8 across 13. Of the 7 measures compared, skmpanel.com leads 4 and themainsmm.com 3. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $2.37 on skmpanel.com against $0.338 on themainsmm.com; Instagram likes: $0.053 on skmpanel.com against $0.062 on themainsmm.com; Instagram views: $0.001 on skmpanel.com against $0.001 on themainsmm.com; Instagram comments: $0.788 on skmpanel.com against $0.433 on themainsmm.com. themainsmm.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
skmpanel.com since 2019, 445K orders on its counter; themainsmm.com since 2022, 9.8M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
skmpanel.com: unclaimed, rated 3.9 across 6 reviews, Trust Score 64. themainsmm.com: unclaimed, rated 1.8 across 13 reviews, Trust Score 58. skmpanel.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.