smm-panel.net vs twig.editor.mpnl.pro
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 18, 2026.
| 2 panels |
37/ 100 · Guarded
|
37/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | SMM (Other/Custom) |
| Services listed | 968 | 1,033 |
| Lowest price | $0.005 per 1,000 | $0.001 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 1,350,000 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | no growth read | — |
| User rating | 4.5 of 5 · 1 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smm-panel.net 6 · twig.editor.mpnl.pro 6
| Service |  smm-panel.net |  twig.editor.mpnl.pro |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.48 | $0.16 |
| Instagram likes | $0.07 | $0.01 |
| Instagram views | $0.01 | $0.002 |
| Instagram comments | $0.57 | $0.50 |
| YouTube likes | $0.75 | $1.15 |
| YouTube views | $0.76 | $0.05 |
| YouTube subscribers | $24.00 | $1.80 |
| Telegram members | $0.16 | $6.00 |
| Facebook followers | $0.21 | $1.00 |
| Facebook likes | $0.14 | $0.20 |
| Facebook views | $0.03 | $0.08 |
| Facebook comments | $1.16 | $20.00 |
| Facebook shares | $0.43 | $5.00 |
| Twitter / X followers | $2.00 | $0.55 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.005 | $1.25 |
| Twitter / X shares | $1.50 | $1.50 |
| Spotify followers | $0.32 | $4.00 |
| Spotify views | $0.34 | $1.30 |
| LinkedIn followers | $9.40 | $5.00 |
| LinkedIn likes | $12.00 | $10.00 |
| LinkedIn shares | $52.50 | $10.00 |
| Other views | $0.32 | $0.60 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
smm-panel.net against…
smm-panel.net vs twig.editor.mpnl.pro: questions and answers
Answers about smm-panel.net vs twig.editor.mpnl.pro from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 18, 2026.
smm-panel.net and twig.editor.mpnl.pro both score 37 of 100 on the Trust Score. twig.editor.mpnl.pro is the older of the two, online since 2024; smm-panel.net since 2025. smm-panel.net lists 968 services from $0.005 per 1,000, twig.editor.mpnl.pro 1,033 from $0.001. On the 8 services both sell, twig.editor.mpnl.pro is cheaper on 6. smm-panel.net shows a public counter — 1.4M orders — while twig.editor.mpnl.pro shows none. smm-panel.net is rated 4.5 of 5 across 1 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of twig.editor.mpnl.pro there. Of the 5 measures compared, twig.editor.mpnl.pro leads 3 and smm-panel.net 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.48 on smm-panel.net against $0.16 on twig.editor.mpnl.pro; Instagram likes: $0.07 on smm-panel.net against $0.01 on twig.editor.mpnl.pro; Instagram views: $0.01 on smm-panel.net against $0.002 on twig.editor.mpnl.pro; Instagram comments: $0.57 on smm-panel.net against $0.50 on twig.editor.mpnl.pro. twig.editor.mpnl.pro is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
smm-panel.net since 2025, 1.4M orders on its counter; twig.editor.mpnl.pro since 2024, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
smm-panel.net: unclaimed, rated 4.5 across 1 reviews, Trust Score 37. twig.editor.mpnl.pro: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 37. twig.editor.mpnl.pro has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.