smmexo.com vs socialpanel.app
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 28, 2026.
| 2 panels |
42/ 100 · Fair
|
42/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 2,041 | 1,600 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.0012 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 62,622 orders | 1,995,752 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 249 a day (+7,474 over 30 days) | no growth read |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmexo.com 9 · socialpanel.app 3
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.19 | $0.543 |
| Instagram likes | $0.06 | $0.08 |
| Instagram views | $0.01 | $0.0012 |
| Instagram comments | $0.51 | $0.428 |
| Instagram shares | $0.22 | $0.0016 |
| TikTok followers | $0.68 | $2.95 |
| TikTok likes | $0.07 | $0.147 |
| TikTok views | $0.01 | $0.014 |
| TikTok comments | $1.66 | $6.76 |
| TikTok shares | $0.08 | $0.088 |
| YouTube likes | $0.61 | $0.686 |
| YouTube views | $0.24 | $0.31 |
| YouTube subscribers | $18.44 | $32.82 |
| YouTube comments | $1.13 | $1.56 |
| Telegram likes | $0.13 | $0.039 |
| Telegram views | $0.05 | $0.0016 |
| Telegram members | $0.03 | $2.09 |
| Telegram shares | $1.16 | $0.059 |
| Facebook followers | $0.11 | $0.155 |
| Facebook likes | $0.09 | $0.151 |
| Facebook views | $0.02 | $0.027 |
| Facebook comments | $1.41 | $2.70 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.61 | $3.43 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.61 | $1.32 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.01 | $0.0018 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.61 | $2.20 |
| Spotify views | $0.60 | $0.308 |
| LinkedIn followers | $13.70 | $11.04 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
smmexo.com vs socialpanel.app: questions and answers
Answers about smmexo.com vs socialpanel.app from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 28, 2026.
smmexo.com and socialpanel.app both score 42 of 100 on the Trust Score. socialpanel.app is the older of the two, online since 2018; smmexo.com since 2025. smmexo.com lists 2,041 services from $0.01 per 1,000, socialpanel.app 1,600 from $0.0012. On the 8 services both sell, smmexo.com is cheaper on 5. smmexo.com's public counter stands at 63K orders (about 249 a day (+7,474 over 30 days)), socialpanel.app's at 2M. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, smmexo.com leads 3 and socialpanel.app 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.19 on smmexo.com against $0.543 on socialpanel.app; Instagram likes: $0.06 on smmexo.com against $0.08 on socialpanel.app; Instagram views: $0.01 on smmexo.com against $0.0012 on socialpanel.app; Instagram comments: $0.51 on smmexo.com against $0.428 on socialpanel.app. smmexo.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
smmexo.com since 2025, 63K orders on its counter; socialpanel.app since 2018, 2M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
smmexo.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 42. socialpanel.app: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 42. smmexo.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.