smmfastboost.com vs streamviews.net
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 29, 2026.
| 2 panels |
41/ 100 · Guarded
|
41/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 375 | 3,597 |
| Lowest price | $0.0018 per 1,000 | $0.01 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 8,628 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 149 a day (+4,466 over 30 days) | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: streamviews.net 8 · smmfastboost.com 4
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram likes | $0.208 | $0.15 |
| Instagram views | $0.021 | $0.01 |
| Instagram comments | $1.25 | $1.50 |
| Instagram shares | $0.166 | $0.03 |
| TikTok followers | $7.00 | $2.50 |
| TikTok likes | $0.641 | $0.35 |
| TikTok views | $0.013 | $0.02 |
| YouTube likes | $0.719 | $0.75 |
| YouTube views | $0.839 | $0.52 |
| YouTube subscribers | $21.57 | $0.13 |
| YouTube comments | $1.65 | $7.92 |
| Telegram likes | $0.285 | $0.09 |
| Telegram views | $0.046 | $0.02 |
| Telegram members | $0.296 | $0.24 |
| Facebook followers | $0.238 | $0.35 |
| Facebook likes | $0.166 | $0.21 |
| Facebook views | $0.037 | $0.06 |
| Facebook members | $0.429 | $0.53 |
| Facebook comments | $2.64 | $5.35 |
| Facebook shares | $1.33 | $2.23 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.20 | $0.75 |
| Twitter / X likes | $5.96 | $0.23 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0018 | $0.01 |
| Twitter / X comments | $8.45 | $50.00 |
| Twitter / X shares | $19.87 | $0.08 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
smmfastboost.com against…
smmfastboost.com vs streamviews.net: questions and answers
Answers about smmfastboost.com vs streamviews.net from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 29, 2026.
smmfastboost.com and streamviews.net both score 41 of 100 on the Trust Score. smmfastboost.com is the older of the two, online since 2022; streamviews.net since 2023. smmfastboost.com lists 375 services from $0.0018 per 1,000, streamviews.net 3,597 from $0.01. On the 8 services both sell, streamviews.net is cheaper on 5. smmfastboost.com shows a public counter — 8,628 orders, about 149 a day (+4,466 over 30 days) — while streamviews.net shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, smmfastboost.com leads 3 and streamviews.net 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram likes: $0.208 on smmfastboost.com against $0.15 on streamviews.net; Instagram views: $0.021 on smmfastboost.com against $0.01 on streamviews.net; Instagram comments: $1.25 on smmfastboost.com against $1.50 on streamviews.net; Instagram shares: $0.166 on smmfastboost.com against $0.03 on streamviews.net. streamviews.net is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
smmfastboost.com since 2022, 8,628 orders on its counter; streamviews.net since 2023, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
smmfastboost.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 41. streamviews.net: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 41. smmfastboost.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.