smmflare.com vs xmediasmm.in
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 24, 2026.
| 2 panels |
51/ 100 · Fair
|
50/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 5,211 | 2,158 |
| Lowest price | $0.001 per 1,000 | $0.0005 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 3.9 of 5 · 96 reviews | 4.0 of 5 · 15 reviews |
| Review platforms | RatingFacts, Sitejabber | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmflare.com 7 · xmediasmm.in 5
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.46 | $0.58 |
| Instagram likes | $0.07 | $0.081 |
| Instagram views | $0.001 | $0.0005 |
| Instagram comments | $0.42 | $0.36 |
| Instagram shares | $0.002 | $0.0015 |
| TikTok followers | $1.32 | $0.937 |
| TikTok likes | $0.14 | $0.18 |
| TikTok views | $0.003 | $0.0074 |
| TikTok comments | $0.66 | $1.97 |
| YouTube likes | $0.19 | $0.264 |
| YouTube views | $0.43 | $0.179 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.01 | $0.011 |
| YouTube comments | $1.40 | $2.06 |
| Telegram likes | $0.014 | $0.016 |
| Telegram views | $0.005 | $0.0015 |
| Telegram members | $0.25 | $0.065 |
| Facebook followers | $0.15 | $0.132 |
| Facebook likes | $0.11 | $0.09 |
| Facebook views | $0.03 | $0.02 |
| Facebook members | $0.25 | $0.537 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.76 | $0.881 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.73 | $0.839 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.002 | $0.0019 |
| Twitter / X comments | $48.24 | $30.14 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.14 | $0.123 |
| Spotify followers | $0.17 | $0.255 |
| Spotify views | $0.15 | $0.24 |
| LinkedIn followers | $10.17 | $4.79 |
| LinkedIn likes | $11.63 | $8.42 |
| Reddit likes | $5.04 | $7.43 |
| WhatsApp likes | $0.03 | $2.90 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
smmflare.com vs xmediasmm.in: questions and answers
Answers about smmflare.com vs xmediasmm.in from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 24, 2026.
smmflare.com scores 51 of 100 on the Trust Score, xmediasmm.in 50 — a 1-point gap. xmediasmm.in is the older of the two, online since 2021; smmflare.com since 2022. smmflare.com lists 5,211 services from $0.001 per 1,000, xmediasmm.in 2,158 from $0.0005. On the 8 services both sell, neither is cheaper overall. Users rate smmflare.com 3.9 of 5 across 96 reviews, xmediasmm.in 4.0 across 15. The measures split evenly between the two — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.46 on smmflare.com against $0.58 on xmediasmm.in; Instagram likes: $0.07 on smmflare.com against $0.081 on xmediasmm.in; Instagram views: $0.001 on smmflare.com against $0.0005 on xmediasmm.in; Instagram comments: $0.42 on smmflare.com against $0.36 on xmediasmm.in. Neither is cheaper overall; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
smmflare.com since 2022, no public counter; xmediasmm.in since 2021, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
smmflare.com: unclaimed, rated 3.9 across 96 reviews, Trust Score 51. xmediasmm.in: unclaimed, rated 4.0 across 15 reviews, Trust Score 50. smmflare.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.