takipji.com vs thekclaut.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 11, 2026.
| 2 panels |
40/ 100 · Guarded
|
41/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,524 | 286 |
| Lowest price | $0.0012 per 1,000 | $0.0022 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 775,751 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 74 a day (+2,227 over 30 days) | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | 4.5 of 5 · 82 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: takipji.com 8 · thekclaut.com 4
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.385 | $1.66 |
| Instagram likes | $0.069 | $0.053 |
| Instagram views | $0.0061 | $0.0028 |
| Instagram comments | $2.20 | $1.68 |
| Instagram shares | $0.038 | $0.0073 |
| TikTok followers | $1.54 | $2.23 |
| TikTok likes | $0.196 | $0.311 |
| TikTok views | $0.0077 | $0.0086 |
| TikTok comments | $1.95 | $6.48 |
| TikTok shares | $0.137 | $0.157 |
| YouTube likes | $0.525 | $2.20 |
| YouTube views | $0.426 | $1.60 |
| YouTube comments | $3.90 | $6.86 |
| Telegram views | $0.0069 | $0.094 |
| Facebook followers | $0.413 | $0.263 |
| Facebook likes | $0.111 | $0.234 |
| Facebook views | $0.07 | $0.078 |
| Facebook comments | $5.40 | $11.96 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.74 | $2.46 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.869 | $1.35 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0012 | $0.0022 |
| Twitter / X comments | $4.01 | $14.38 |
| Twitter / X shares | $1.19 | $1.78 |
| Spotify followers | $0.263 | $0.421 |
| LinkedIn comments | $26.45 | $14.10 |
| Audiomack views | $8.14 | $0.783 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
takipji.com vs thekclaut.com: questions and answers
Answers about takipji.com vs thekclaut.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 11, 2026.
thekclaut.com scores 41 of 100 on the Trust Score, takipji.com 40 — a 1-point gap. thekclaut.com is the older of the two, online since 2021; takipji.com since 2022. takipji.com lists 1,524 services from $0.0012 per 1,000, thekclaut.com 286 from $0.0022. On the 8 services both sell, neither is cheaper overall. takipji.com shows a public counter — 776K orders, about 74 a day (+2,227 over 30 days) — while thekclaut.com shows none. thekclaut.com is rated 4.5 of 5 across 82 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of takipji.com there. The measures split evenly between the two — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.385 on takipji.com against $1.66 on thekclaut.com; Instagram likes: $0.069 on takipji.com against $0.053 on thekclaut.com; Instagram views: $0.0061 on takipji.com against $0.0028 on thekclaut.com; Instagram comments: $2.20 on takipji.com against $1.68 on thekclaut.com. Neither is cheaper overall; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
takipji.com since 2022, 776K orders on its counter; thekclaut.com since 2021, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
takipji.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 40. thekclaut.com: unclaimed, rated 4.5 across 82 reviews, Trust Score 41. thekclaut.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.